Kingston PC2-4300 Value RAM

As one of the largest retail and OEM memory suppliers, Kingston produces a huge amount of DIMMs for the world market. As with other finished memory makers, Kingston uses chips from chip manufacturers like Micron, Samsung, Elpida, and others. They then assemble the memory from selected or custom PCBs, and market the finished memory product in the retail and OEM channels.

Kingston supplied a pair of Value RAM for the DDR2 roundup. Value RAM is among the most reasonable of the Kingston memory offerings, and they are not specially selected chips such as those used in the Kingston HyperX series, for example.



Test DIMMs were a matched pair of single-sided 512MB DDR2 PC 4300 DIMMs without heat spreaders.



Kingston uses the high-density Elpida chips in their DDR2. This means that they can also easily produce a double-side 1GB version using the same Elpida chips.

Test Results: Kingston PC2-4300 Value RAM

The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.

Kingston PC2-4300 (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Single-Bank
Speed Memory Timings & Voltage Quake3 fps Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
533DDR
800FSB
4-3-3-10
1.8V
367.2 INT 2877
FLT 2952
INT 4886
FLT 4890
108
667DDR
1000FSB
4-4-4-10
1.9V
456.1 INT 3524
FLT 3560
INT 6064
FLT 6084
86
686DDR
258FSB
4-4-4-10
1.9V
465.8 INT 3650
FLT 3693
INT 6232
FLT 6235
85

Kingston PC2-4300 (DDR2 533)
Speed RCW-ET
Radar
Aida 32
Read
Aida 32
Write
Aida 32
Total
533DDR
800FSB
78.0 5353 2008 7361
667DDR
1000FSB
97.3 6543 2392 8935
686DDR
258FSB
99.5 6796 2494 9290

The Kingston Value Ram was an average performer in our tests. We do not know whether this is a result of the single-sided design of the 512MB modules or the result of the Elpida chips performing somewhat poorer than the Micron chips used in Crucial, Micron, Kingmax, and Corsair. The performance is about what you would expect from a bargain DIMM, except for the fact that even the Kingston Value ran without incident at DDR2 667 and at the highest speed DDR2 686, at the same timings and modest voltage settings. The Kingston required slightly slower 4-3-3 timings at DDR2 533 than the DIMMs with Micron chips, but the timings and required voltage at 667 and 686 matched the best in our roundup.

In case the developing message is not clear enough, every memory that we have tested so far in this roundup is able to run at DDR2 667 and DDR2 686 with complete stability. In almost every case, the 667 timings required are 4-4-4 instead of the slower JEDEC 5-5-5 standard. The voltage required for 667 and 686 operation is almost a modest increase to 1.9V from 1.8V in most cases.

Kingmax DDR2-533 Micron PC2-4300U
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    #9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.
  • FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Hi Wesley, nice article. :)

    Something to change:
    At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
    Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
  • MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    > When can we expect DDR2 for A64?

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
  • mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...
  • Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.
  • KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...
  • rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?
  • Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!

    :)
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    or... im blind..
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link

    you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now