DFI LANParty 925X-T2: Features and Layout


 DFI LANParty 925X-T2 Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket 775 Pentium 4 (Prescott)
Chipset Intel 925X/ICH6R
Bus Speeds 200MHz to 300MHz (in 1MHz increments)
PCI Speeds To CPU, 33.33, Auto
PCI Express Speeds Auto, Fix 100-140
DDR2 Speeds Auto, 400, 533
Core Voltage 0.8375V to 1.85V
DRAM Voltage 1.8V to 2.5V in 0.1V increments
Northbridge Voltage 1.5V to 1.8V in 0.1V increments
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR2 Slots
Dual-Channel Unbuffered Memory to 4GB
Expansion Slots 1 PCIe x16 Slot
3 PCIe x1 slot
3 PCI Slots
Onboard SATA/IDE RAID 4 SATA 150 drives by ICH6R
Can be combined in RAID 0, 1, Intel Matrix
Onboard IDE One Standard ATA100/66
(2 drives)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports
2 IEEE 1394 FireWire Ports by VIA VT6307
Onboard LAN 2 Gigabit LAN - Marvel 88E8053 PCIe and
Marvel 88E8001 PCI
Onboard Audio Karajan Module with Realtek ALC880 Codec with Independent Variable Sampling
8-Channel with SPDIF in/out
Tested BIOS 925LC803

When DFI first introduced the LANParty boards a little over a year ago, they were not a name with which many Enthusiasts were familiar. However, since that time, DFI has earned a solid reputation as a maker of some of the best-performing and most sought-after boards available in the Enthusiast market. The 925X-T2 is DFI's second design for the Intel socket, following the highly regarded LANParty boards for socket 478.

The LANParty 925X-T2 keeps all the bells and whistles that made the original LANParty series so unique. This includes UV slots and ports, matching UV sensitive round cables, a flexible FrontX port box that will fit in a 5-1/4 bay and organize your ports, and the completely unique PC Transpo for carrying your desktop system to LAN parties.

There are also a couple of new additions to generation 3 of LANParty. DFI included coordinated UV sleeving for the other cables in your rig, and High-Definition audio is provided by a plug-in Karajan module. DFI tells us that the plug-in audio module allows the electrical isolation of the audio codec, resulting in a lower noise than you might experience with an on-board audio codec.

The rest of the features are a complete implementation of the 925X/ICH6R chipset, with the added benefit of two Gigabit LAN controllers. One LAN controller sits on the faster PCI Express bus and the other is on the PCI bus.

In overclocking, the DFI offers the widest range of voltages that you will see on any of the boards in the roundup. It is the only 925X with DDR2 memory voltage adjustments to 2.5V and a CPU voltage adjustment to 1.85V. These values should even put smiles on the faces of users who plan to use water-cooling or phase-change cooling. Northbridge voltage is also adjustable. Instead of making all the PCIe decisions for you, like boards that only offer Auto adjustments, or forcing extensive manual trial and error- like manual only controls, the DFI offers both options. You can let the board make the sliding ratio adjustments for you with Auto, or you can dial your own with manual PCI fix adjustments.

DFI also continues CMOS reloaded, which was introduced with the second generation LANParty and Infinity boards. This feature allows you to save several different custom BIOS set-ups so that you can easily recall custom BIOS settings for a particular overclock or settings for a different OS. Overclockers and users who run multiple operating systems will really find CMOS Reloaded to be a useful feature.



In general, the DFI is well-laid out for most cases, since it is a board that was designed to be seen in a side window case. One of the more annoying things about the layout is the board edge connector for IDE and the bottom edge floppy connector, which are only a little better located than the Abit. However, the diagnostic LEDs on the DFI are better located than the Abit. They are clear of obstructions so you can actually see the LEDs during boot. The 24-pin and 4-pin power connectors are both near board edges to the right of the CPU and are probably the best located of any board in this roundup. You don't even have to snake the 4-pin around the CPU as you do in some other 925X designs in the roundup. The Karajan audio module was a little flimsy in our early board, but DFI told us when we got the board that shipping boards would have a bracket to secure the module. That should take care of that issue.

As we have come to expect with LANParty boards, DFI continues to innovate with their flagship line of boards. The LANParty is clearly aimed at the computer Enthusiast who wants to show off their rig, and it makes no apologies for being brash and showy. No matter how much it glows, the LANParty boards wouldn't sell unless they also delivered top-notch Enthusiast-level performance, and DFI continues to lavish most of their attention on how the LANParty boards actually perform.

Asus P5AD2 Premium: Overclocking and Stress Testing DFI LANParty 925X-T2: Overclocking and Stress Testing
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • johnsonx - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    What is it with you people griping about CPU choices? This is a review of current top-end 925X boards, not a CPU review! The FX-53 scores are there only for a point of reference. Added to that, Wesley's point is VERY valid: the 560 and FX-53 ARE the top CPU's from each camp.

    If you really want to know how a 3800+ would perform, refer to past Socket-939 reviews, or just mentally subtract about 3% or so.

    STOP WHINING!
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    #17 - Since we were trying to determine the maximum overclocking ability of the boards tested, we used a 3.6 ES LGA 775 Prescott at a 14 multiplier (2.8Ghz). The 14x280 is close to 3.9GHz speed. We also checked with a retail 540 (3.2GHz) and reached 250FSB (4.0GHz) at 1.45V.

    These results lead us to believe that many 775 Prescotts will top out at 3.9 to 4.0GHz on boards that will support those overclock levels. That means that there are likely some 2.8 Prescotts out there that can reach 280FSB.

    As always, overclocking is variable, and you need a really great power supply and decent cooling to support the power requirements at these kinds of overclocks.
  • Carfax - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    Wesley, is it possible to do a review of Prescott which focuses on the upcoming 1ghz FSB? I've heard that Prescott scales better than N.W with a higher FSB and greater clockspeed..

    To do the review correctly, you'd need an engineering sample with an unlocked multiplier, so you can see the benefit of the increased FSB, without raising the clockspeed.

    I think Prescott would do pretty well on 1066FSB and with fast DDR2 memory..
  • danidentity - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    Wes,

    When you say you hit 280 FSB with the Asus P5AD2, was that with a retail chip, multiplier locked? Or were you using an ES chip. If you were using a retail, that is an absolutely insane overclock.
  • danidentity - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    >> Better than comparing a 3500+ to a 3.6F anyway :P

    How would a 3500+ compare with a Intel 3.6? Could it hang? :)
  • RyanVM - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    I have no problem with the 3.6E and FX53 being shown together since both platforms will end up costing about the same (factoring in CPU, mobo, and memory costs). Prices fluctuate, yes, but both companies (OK, mainly AMD) tend to adjust prices to stay in line with performance levels (if Intel drops the 3.6E price, I'd put money on AMD dropping prices at the high end within a day or two).

    Better than comparing a 3500+ to a 3.6F anyway :P
  • Creig - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    #12/#13 Given the way pricing can fluctuate, it would be futile to compare Intel $$$ to AMD $$$. A couple of days after the article was published, pricing could change to make the monetary comparison useless and therefore misleading.

    I think they're doing it the correct way. It's up to the end user to find his/her best balance between performance and price.
  • mjz5 - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    man, i should of read #12 first before posting it.. why not have an edit button?

    anyhow, u all know what i'm saying!!!
  • mjz5 - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    the way i see it is that CPUs should be compared by price. If an AMD FX-53 cost as much as a Celeron 2.4 GHz, why not compare the two? If someone is going to looking at these products because they cost X dollars, they aren't interested in seeing that an Intel CPU that cost (X*2) may or not surpass it the competitor at only X dollars.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, August 12, 2004 - link

    #9 & #10 - Corrected

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now