Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

With a 50MHz higher clock frequency than the 6100, we really expected the Asus A8N-VM to handily win all the Integrated Graphics benchmarks. That didn't happen. Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory and UT2004 behave as expected, with the A8N-VM at the top of the performance chart by a small, but significant margin. However, Doom 3 and Far Cry show the Biostar 6100 as the better performer. Either there is very little performance difference between the 6100 and 6150 chipsets, or the Biostar is a particularly effective design with a well-optimized BIOS.

General Performance, 3D Graphics & Encoding Audio and Ethernet Performance
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • formulav8 - Sunday, December 4, 2005 - link

    Speak for yourself.
  • jfreiman - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    What are the chances that this is not Asus' HTPC motherboard?

    Could they be developing another model for a home theater PC? -- If so, will it use the nVidia chipset?

    As much as I want to use this board for my HTPC, I have to examine why Asus would not have - at the very minimum, included a spidif cable and TV out cable.

    Something just doesn't fit in this picture.

    -John
  • Calin - Friday, December 2, 2005 - link

    I would like to have game performance compared to a single channel board using one of the current integrated graphic chipsets - there is a Biostar board for Socket 754 and a Asrock one. Or at least to have performance checked with a single DIMM (or two DIMMs in single channel mode)
    Thanks
  • jamawass - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    Poor implementation of a good idea by Asus.This chipset screams htpc, why have HD audio without out of the box spdif? Might as well have realtek audio. The S video out should also be standard with an optional component out dongle for those who need it. Add-on brackets take up pci openings on the case, quite a few htpc cases are microatx where these slots are a premium.
  • ShadowVlican - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    aw man.... if only this board can OC...
  • jfreiman - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    According to the picture of the motherboad the board you tested was 1.01.

    However, I just read that there is a 2.0 rev board. Are you aware of this? Do you know if this is accurate?

    I can't find anything about this on the Asus site and would like to know about this before I get the final piece (motherboard/video) for my HTPC upgrade.

    Thanks for the quick review, and I too would like to know more about it's CPU utilization during DVD and HDTV playback.

    Again, thank you.

    -John
    PS. and if I missed it, what was the BIOS revision you used for your tests.
  • Gary Key - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    quote:

    PS. and if I missed it, what was the BIOS revision you used for your tests.


    AMI 0506
  • plonk420 - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    may we see HL2 and MPEG2/WMV9 decoding benchmarks, please, Anand? also, how does one go about purchasing the addon card, and is it S-Video only, or is there hope for component out?
  • BigLan - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    Does the nvidia firewall actually work on this board, or does it corrupt zip archives as have been reported with the nforce4?
  • Leper Messiah - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    Performance is mediocore, features missing, can't OC. Guess I'll be sticking with a biostar 6100-T for my next F@H box.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now