Overclocking

Our previous experiences with overclocking Foxconn motherboards have been disappointing at best, and we have taken Foxconn to task over the matter. Have things improved with their latest and easiest offering? Take a look at the results below.

Foxconn C51-XEM2AA
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 - 4800+ (AM2)
Chipset: nForce 590SLI
CPU Voltage: 1.600V (1.300V default)
Memory Settings: 5-5-5-15 2T 12x Multiplier
3-3-3-9 1T 9x Multiplier
DDR2 Results: 12 x 256HTT = DDR2 1024
9 x 320HTT = DDR2 640
HT Multiplier: 5x below 300HTT, 4x above 300HTT
Memory Voltage: 2.2V
Chipset Voltage: 1.65V
HT Voltage: 1.35V
Cooling: Zalman CNPS9500 AM2
Power Supply: OCZ GamexStream 700W
Maximum CPU OverClock: 256HTT x 12 (3072MHz) +28%
Maximum FSB OverClock: 320HTT x 9 (2880MHz) +60%
 

We wouldn't worry too much about maximum CPU clock attained, as that will vary from CPU to CPU, and cooling solutions and other factors come into play. Motherboard quality will also affect overclocking, but other results we've seen from around the web generally support our experience with this Foxconn board. We were able to run at a maximum HyperTransport bus speed of 320 MHz without difficulties, though it did require some adjustment of the chipset voltages. The active cooling of our Northbridge definitely helped matters, however, as we experienced periodic instability above 260 MHz without the extra fan.


Active cooling requirements aside (yes, we realize that the above isn't an ideal mechanism for mounting a fan), a 320 MHz HTT bus with a 4X HyperTransport multiplier is a stellar result in comparison to previous Foxconn boards. True, most AM2 motherboards are easily pulling 300 MHz, but at least we don't have to make any apologies for Foxconn this time. The BIOS supports bus frequencies up to 500 MHz, but it would probably take a lot more than just an extra fan to reach any of them with stability. If you're looking for the absolute best overclocking AM2 motherboard, Foxconn still falls behind a few other offerings (maximum theoretical HTT setting notwithstanding), but for more typical overclocking the 320 MHz bus speed achieved should be more than sufficient. Just get a CPU that supports at least a 10X multiplier and you will almost certainly hit the limits of your processor before you are able to max out the Foxconn motherboard.

Memory Stress Testing

The wide range of voltage controls for most of the critical components help users to get the most out of overclocking attempts as well as memory modules. Most DDR2-800 memory is rated at conservative 5-5-5-15 timings, but that's also assuming you only run with the default 1.8 V. We have found in our DDR2 testing that many modules are easily able to run 4-4-4-12 timings at 2.0 V, and the Corsair modules we are testing with (rated at 5-5-5-18 DDR2-1066) are generally able to run with 3-3-3-9 timings with approximately 2.2 V. This Foxconn board supports all the necessary voltages to get the most out of DDR2 memory, and we were able to match the results of most other AM2 motherboards when it came to memory timings.

Foxconn C51-XEM2AA
Stable DDR2-800 Timings - 2 DIMMs
(2/4 slots populated - 1 Dual-Channel Bank)
Clock Speed: 200MHz
Timing Mode: 800MHz - Default
CAS Latency: 3
RAS to CAS Delay: 3
RAS Precharge: 3
RAS Cycle Time: 9
Command Rate: 2T
Voltage: 2.1V

With two DIMMs installed, testing was completely stable at 3-3-3-9 2T timings at DDR2-800. We could also run 3-3-3-9 1T timings at DDR2-667, but performance was slightly better at DDR2 800 with the 2T command rate. The voltage required for complete stability was 2.1V, which is slightly lower than on other competing motherboards. We're not going to worry about an extra 0.05 V, as variability in memory modules could account for that margin of error, but the fine 0.0250V adjustment granularity that the Foxconn board offers should allow you to tweak your RAM for optimal performance.

Foxconn C51-XEM2AA
Stable DDR2-800 Timings - 4 DIMMs
(4/4 slots populated - 2 Dual-Channel Banks)
Clock Speed: 200MHz
Timing Mode: 800MHz - Default
CAS Latency: 3
RAS to CAS Delay: 4
RAS Precharge: 3
RAS Cycle Time: 10
Command Rate: 2T
Voltage: 2.2V

Installing four DIMMs stresses the memory subsystem further, and you can see that we had to drop the tRCD setting to 4 in order to get the system to run stably. The difference in performance between tRCD 3 and tRCD 4 is negligible, however, and our 3-4-3-10 2T results are similar to what many other AM2 motherboards are achieving with four DIMMs. (Changes to the tRAS setting have an even smaller effect on performance, and so far we have determined that a tRAS value of 9-14 is optimal with DDR2-800.) We also had to add another 0.100 V, but we're not too concerned about that, as this merely brings the Foxconn RAM voltage up to the level of most other AM2 motherboards.

Foxconn: Board Layout Gigabyte: Board Layout
Comments Locked

36 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    You are correct: there was a bit of confusion between Gary and myself (he was hoping to validate benchmarks). Somewhere along the way I thought that he actually managed to get the Foxconn board running at 332, but in reviewing my e-mail he maxed out at 314 or something. He has a pre-release Board where as I have the retail shipping Foxconn motherboard, so my results were supposed be used. I have corrected this information now. :-)
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    hoping = helping. Sorry.
  • glennpratt - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    If you got your specs right, then the Foxconn (ALC882D) has Dolby Digital Live.... HUGE DIFFERENCE.

    ALC882D features Dolby® Digital Live output for consumer equipment

    http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/products1-2.asp...">http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/products1-2.asp...
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    Yes, they are accurate. Dolby Digital Live support does make the 882D technically superior, but I'm not sure either one is really all that different in actual practice. I used both motherboards, and at least with games I really would be hard-pressed to tell which was which.
  • glennpratt - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    Well, DDL support means that you can go direct into your reciever with AC3 digital sound over SPDIF/TOSLINK, so A) you don't have to use crappy onboard DACs and B) you don't need a big mess of wires to get six channel out. AKA, what we all loved about SoundStorm and nForce 1/2.

    IMO, if DDL functions properly and that's what you wan't to use, then you have no reason to spend $80-$130 they are charging for DDL soundcards these days.
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, June 22, 2006 - link

    I have updated the text slightly now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now