Standard Gaming Performance

We tested with a small group of games due to time constraints, but we picked games based on a variety of game engines to give a quick indication of the boards' performance. Additional testing will be done in our full board reviews but for this roundup we are using Serious Sam 2, Half Life 2: Lost Coast, F.E.A.R, Quake 4, and Battlefield 2. All boards were tested with the EVGA 7900GTX using NVIDIA 91.31 WHQL drivers. The Intel 975X boards were also tested with a single ATI X1900XTX card with the Catalyst 6.6 driver.

Gaming Performance - Battlefield 2

Gaming Performance - F.E.A.R.

Gaming Performance - Half Life 2

Gaming Performance - Quake 4

Gaming Performance - Serious Sam II

The two most performance oriented boards in our roundup are the ASUS P5W-DH and Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6 boards, and they complete our gaming benchmarks with scores at or near the top of each game category. The most consistent board in the roundup is the Biostar TForce P965 Deluxe that stayed the course throughout testing by remaining in the middle sector of the group. Although the Biostar board did not finish first, it also did not have swings where it was at the top of one benchmark and near the bottom on another one. The ASRock board finished last among the 7900GTX boards four times and second to last on the Quake 4 test where it had its best showing. Overall, the scores generated by this group of boards are so close that you would be hard pressed to actually see or feel the difference in real game play.

The ATI X1900XTX cards finished significantly behind the NVIDIA cards in Half Life 2: Lost Coast where they generally score even or ahead of NVIDIA depending upon game settings. While their performance in the DOOM 3 engine games are normally several percentage points behind the NVIDIA based cards until recently, the difference in our Quake 4 test is also perplexing with the current 6.6 driver release. We ran our ATI X1900XTX in the ASUS P5N32-SLI board and the percentage differences between the GPUs were the same that we see on the AMD S939 or AM2 platforms. It appears to us at this time there is an ATI driver bug with the current Intel chipsets and Core 2 Duo, or perhaps a lack of optimization.

General Performance & Overclocking High-Resolution Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

123 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gary Key - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    I did not see any tpoys... :)
  • R3MF - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    "The 965 has an X8 PCIe slot and an X4 PCIe slot and does not support CrossFire"

    the tech-diagram on the same page clearly says:
    16x PCIe on the northbridge
    6x1 PCIe on the southbridge

    which is it?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    I've edited the wording slightly. You are correct that the NB only supports an X16, and there is at most an X4 from the SB. It should read correctly now.
  • yacoub - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    How about a pagedetailing who actually has them in stock and hasn't price-gouged them? ;)
    It could link to the RTPE.
    Hopefully by the time Part2 comes out, C2Ds will actually be available.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    We are disappointed in the intial pricing structures but when demand exceeds supply you know what you get.... :)
  • zsdersw - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    No GA-965P-DS3? Is there a reason it wasn't included in the roundup?
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    We have one on its way for review in the near future for review. In fact, over the course of the next four weeks we will probably receive 20 or more Conroe boards so expect a lot of motherboard coverage in August. ;-)
  • zsdersw - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    Thanks. Looking forward to it.
  • yacoub - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    Thank you, guys! This is a huge help.
  • danidentity - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    GREAT article!

    I wonder if the 965 chipset over time will become faster than 975 with BIOS revisions.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now