Disk Performance –

PCMark Vantage -

We utilize the PCMark Vantage disk performance tests on a regular basis as they provide a general indication to actual desktop performance with various storage devices. Our test results today concentrate on the total suite score and results from the application loading benchmark.

Storage Performance - SSD

Storage Performance - SSD

Even though the ICH7 is feature limited, it still maintains to lead the SB710/SB750 Southbridges in our Vantage performance tests. The total suite score favors the ICH7 by 2% while the application loading test suite indicates the SB710 is about 6% slower in this particular benchmark that reflects most SOHO usage patterns.

The latest AMD SSD tuned SB driver increased our total suite score from 16432 to 24653 and the application loading score from 59.1MB/s to 83.7 MB/s compared to the inbox Windows 7 driver. We did not notice any performance differences between the inbox Intel driver and the latest driver update from Intel. That said, the AMD driver properly disabled Prefetch, Indexing, and Defrag on our SSD while the Intel driver left these items enabled on the ICH7 system.

Transfer Tests -

In these two particular tests, we are concentrating on transfer throughput from our WD 300GB VelociRaptor to our 80GB Kingston SSD (Intel X25-M) SSD. Our first test consists of transferring a folder that is 2.31GB in size and contains our 35 test videos. The second test consists of a folder that is 1.08GB in size and contains 2454 files of various documents and images.

Storage Performance - HD to SSD

Storage Performance - HD to SSD

In the large file test, the ICH7 is about 13% quicker than the SB710. The small file transfer test has the ICH7 retaining a 14% lead over the SB710. Regarding both results, we never noticed the AMD system being slower than the Intel system in daily usage.

USB Performance -

AMD rightly took a lot of blame for poor USB performance in the SB450/SB600 Southbridges and set off to correct these problems in the latest SB7xx series. For the most part they have succeeded. However, we discovered that utilizing HDTach or similar programs showed that AMD was still a step behind Intel and NVIDIA although this is something we never noticed in daily usage.

Our two USB transfer tests focus on file transfers from our SSD OS drive and our secondary HD to an external 1TB unit from Lacie. The first test consists of transferring a folder that is 954MB in size and contains 28 various files ranging from short videos to PDF files. The second test consists of a folder that is 1.08GB in size and contains 2454 files of various documents and images.

Storage Performance - USB - SSD to External HD

Storage Performance - USB - HD to External HD

In the first test, the SB710 is 7% quicker than the ICH7. Our second transfer test indicates the SB710 is 4% faster than the ICH7.

Let's add a HD 4770 for Better Gaming Performance Power Consumption
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    I was really curious about that section so I'm glad that I can actually view it. Thanks!
  • fic2 - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    I find the choice of a 10k RPM VelociRaptor odd for either HTPC or integrated graphic system. I have my doubts that it would be the HD choice of either user profile.
  • b15h09 - Friday, August 7, 2009 - link

    VelociRaptor because it eliminates a potential bottleneck. This isn't a real world system test.
  • Taft12 - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Yes, I would expect a WD Greenpower drive or one of those new slow-spinning Seagates.
  • Fox5 - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    I remember roadmaps putting the 880G launching this month, but we're just getting the 785G. The 880G seems to be the chipset worth waiting for. Virtualized 3d hardware? Yes please.
  • fzkl - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    A lot of us know that when it comes to an HTPC, Intel is the worst option of the lot. To make things fair, why isn't this a 3-way roundup with the Nvidia GeForce 9300?
  • rtallmansu - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Even more odd to me is why you would compare an Intel G41 with a ICH7 and not a G45 chipset with the newer ICH10. G41 buyers are not interested in any of these performance metrics, were as someone might want to know how the G45 compares for HTPC duties in HD playback.
  • Shaffan - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Such a pity you did not test the RAID performances : RAID5 in particular. I heard the integrated RAID5 of Intel chipset is much better than the one of AMD, but I can't find a decent comparative test about this !
  • flipmode - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    SB710 = no RAID 5
  • mybook4 - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Gary, you put in a lot of effort into this article, thank you! However, I found one part misleading.

    Most of the application benchmarks are dependent on only cpu, not gpu. It confused me that these benchmarks were in an article that compared 780G vs G41. I understand if you were trying to compare the platforms as a whole, but wouldn't that also constitute a component price match (price an amd 780g system with an equal priced G41 system then compare).

    PS. I am a little sick of people saying that anything under 60fps is unplayable. Most people that frequent this site play Crysis at under 40fps.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now